![]() |
| A space best left to equine performers |
Berliner Philharmoniker, Gustavo Dudamel, Gautier Capuçon
Brahms: Variations on a Theme by Joseph Haydn, op. 56a
Haydn: Cello Concerto no. 1 in C major, Hob. VIIb/1
Beethoven: Symphony no. 5 in C minor, Op. 67
This Europakonzert involved turning Heldenplatz
and Michaelerplatz into open-air showrooms for top of the range VWs, and the shambolic sight of these vehicles showing off
their supposed ease of parallel parking amid a procession (for our interval
amusement) of Fiakers led by Lippizaner rejects suggested that the parties
hoping to make promotional hay out of this event had got their wires somewhat
crossed. Vienna’s shameless Tourist Office probably got the most of it, as they
so often do: the programme booklet was fully on message with all the usual crap
about tradition, in contrast to a hapless member of the VW board who pushed
the analogy between the Technik of his engines, the Berlin Phil, and the
Lippizaner so floridly that we all enjoyed a good giggle at his expense. In the
audience the corporate suits from VW and Porsche stuck out like the proverbial
sore thumb with their Karl-Heinz Grasser hairstyles and egos, but if the shoulder pads and botulized faces elsewhere made
this look like your typical Musikverein crowd, it wasn’t really. Just moneyed Adabeis
with no musical taste.
The concert itself was something best
appreciated on TV rather than live. Gone was the legendary immediacy of the
Berlin Phil’s sound, and everything below the treble stave sounded like a
broken VW engine. Very short, fast bows from the firsts, unthinkable in the
Musikverein, compensated somewhat for the hall’s shortcomings, but cellos and
basses were less successful, even when giving the third movement of the Beethoven
their best attack. Hopeless really, in this Augean stable of an acoustic, but
they tried.
Dudamel led a restrained and graceful St.
Anthony Variations and was a sympathetic accompanist in Haydn’s C major cello
concerto; probably some of the classiest conducting I’ve seen from him, on
reflection. Signs of an intelligent musical ear were more apparent than in his
concerts with the Vienna Phil a few months ago: the pealing woodwind runs at
the end of the Brahms were quite delightful, and while there might have been
slightly more spring in the Haydn’s step, some of the detail, again in the
winds, was fairly sharp. We will be seeing a lot of Gautier Capuçon
in Vienna over the twelve months and I should rather reserve judgement until I
hear him perform in some place that isn’t a barn, but from what he did manage
to project I heard some very good things indeed. Like the Phil’s firsts his articulation
was on the curt side at times, but with no loss of style. I’ve said this before
to a cellist friend who thinks I’m barking up the wrong tree, but will say here
again anyway: his tone strikes me as quite like du Pré, or at least du Pré when
she was using the Davidov Strad and playing this concerto, even if it breathes
a little less and acquires intensity in a totally different way. Of course Capuçon,
or few other living cellists for that matter, is not as self-indulgent… but it is
more of a timbral thing than anything else.
The Haydn and Brahms had shown off Dudamel’s rarely
seen Kapellmeister side and he remained in this mode for much of the Beethoven. The pacing
here was good and playing well attended to, some Vienna Phil-style flubs in the
winds and brass excepted, and Dudamel not allowing accelerandos to start too
early paid off at the very end when the winds got the chance to articulate
some semiquaver detail which typically gets lost. The moment of ambiguity in
the third movement bridge passage was nicely done too. As for the rest, well, I
must confess to asking what exactly makes him so special if this is all there
is to his conducting when he isn’t grandstanding.
Don Carlos I missed tonight unfortunately –
too much work stuff to deal with this week, and then I also read this less
enthusiastic report from Bloggerin Rossignol, which I elect to trust more than
the Viennese papers. It returns next year in any case.

I hope you continue to enjoy Capuçon's performances. I can certainly hear the timbral link between him and du Pré, though his intonation is much more accurate. Even when du Pré was physically OK, as in the Barbirolli Elgar, there is a wideness to her tuning - I know she was only 20 or something - which I now can't stomach. That said, Capuçon doesn't always muster her strength in larger works and, when I've heard him here in London playing the Dvořák and the Brahms Double, he has struggled to ride the orchestra.
ReplyDeleteThere are a certainly a few reasons not to like du Pré's Elgar concerto. Out of the recordings I find palatable Starker and Schiff are the most interesting, and with Schiff's latest recording I sense we may be turning a corner, though I suppose the same could have been said of Starker and look what happened...
ReplyDeleteAs for Capuçon and du Pré, I was thinking more of her Haydn/ECO recordings, where the notes are more centred and the vibrato faster. But it is just timbre really; their styles are totally different. The one time I've seen Capuçon live previously was with Schubert chamber works, and the similarity showed itself there too, to my ear. Capuçon not carrying as well in much heavier concerto rep I can well imagine.